Fri 29 Dec 2006
I just got an email from Kelly over at Start Up Princess.com (who, among other things, sells princess stuff; if you stopped by Carolynn’s* kiosk at the Provo mall (and I hope you did), you’re already familiar with her wares). Kelly is interested in gathering women entrepreneurs together for a littl’ conference and I think that’s a great idea. Let me explain why. I’m in favor of diversity in the business community (of the fortune 500 companies, only 10 are run by women). Speaking of women in business, did you know that they are, on average (in many situations), better negotiators than men?**
You probably have your own thoughts on diversity and given the largely conservative base of my readership, perhaps the word connotes a disagreeable image for you. I, too, once felt likewise. Stories of affirmative action quotas disenfranchising meritorious college and business applicants irked me beyond measure; “it’s unfair”, I wanted to scream! It was only during my MBA program that I began to see the matter a little differently. (Don’t get me wrong, I’m still bothered by many aspects of affirmative action.)
Here’s the deal: If you’re searching for the best solution to a dilemma, having a homogeneous problem solver pool is disadvantageous. As an illustration, we studied a case at the U where (some time ago) a certain shoe company (Reebok perhaps?) was having poor luck selling its running shoes to women. Their marketing team was largely male and the advertising campaigns focused on the technical superiority of the new line of shoes. Strangely, women weren’t really moved to buy the product.
A new team was created to study the problem and this new team included several women. They quickly discovered that, as it turns out, many women don’t really care so much about all the nifty features in a shoe (or at least they’re bored when ads cover that topic). On the other hand, if the commercial features montages of emotional experiences had in those shoes (the exhilaration of running through a park on a nice day), women really seem to resonate with that. The TV spots were re-filmed and shoes began to sell.
Now, the story might be trite and even apocryphal, but the lesson is true; it’s not probable that the first group of guys would have really understood how a woman feels about shoes. There is power in heterogeneity!
So ladies, go to the conference. You get lunch and you get to hear from Kristen Lamb (Designit Boutique) and Rachael Herrscher (Today’s Mama). Let me know how it goes as I’m not likely invited.
* I met Carolynn in person, BTW. She’s at once severely focused and energetic and gracious. Quite the amalgam.
** I’ll look up the reference for this. I’ve heard it several times in my negotiation classes.
December 29th, 2006 at 9:55 am
Thanks for the generous and kind mention about the conference, Ryan! Also a thanks for a great and interesting post about what women add to biz.
More and more companies are keeping women in mind with their marketing campaigns and there\’s a lot of confs natioally about marketing to women/moms because they control a major % of spending in the home–so everyone should pay attention to what we like and want!
I must add another stat that I\’ve also heard quoted multiple times and need a ref for: Utah is #1 in the country for women-owned businesses! Ironically we\’re a state that also is majority LDS-based that says women shouldn\’t work outside the home, so I wonder with this stat if being #1 means running a biz with toddlers about (like I do…) lots of hobby-craft-MLM (I hate to say it)-franchise biz owners I would think, and probably a lot that have seasonal times, but nevertheless someone said we\’re #1, so I hope we can get some very high level women entrepreneurs out to our conf, women who are making a difference like Chelsea Rippy at Shade, Kim Jones at Verite, Marcia Hales at My Girl Friend\’s Kitchen, Carol Rice at Cherish Bound, and others! We had a kind mention in Utah Business Magazine that has generated a lot of interest, I hope that we have a very successful turnout.
Thanks so much and Happy 2007!
January 1st, 2007 at 9:29 am
Women are better than Men.
Men are better than Women.
…IN some things.
I hold no prejudice toward people. I do hold some prejudice toward individuals. I for one welcome anyone who runs a business of their own. I for one am getting tired of the argument about who’s “better”. Get past it and you can see some very interesting things happen!
Men and Women are different!
Vive le diffèrence!
January 1st, 2007 at 9:54 am
Hey everyone, Famous Dave is back!!! Good to see ya, Dave.
January 1st, 2007 at 11:25 pm
Thanks for sending your friend/reader Charlotte our way, Ryan. We’re happy to be reaching people beyond our present little circle!