Wed 28 Mar 2007
In January I wrote about my New Year’s Resolution of Getting Bigger. In February I reported my noticeable weight gaining and strength progress.
Just last week, feeling confident in my larger stature, I wrestled the founder of my company, a largish man we’ll call “Matt”, in the office lobby. Not only did I take Matt down with ease, but he was heard coughing and wheezing for upwards of an hour afterwards.
Yesterday at Gold’s Gym I weighed myself, as has become my habit after working out. I was happily surprised to see that I, at last, broke the 200 lb barrier.
That got me thinking. Though I hope that much of my weight gain has been muscle, surely some of it has been fat. What advantages will I have, now that I have more fat?
Advantages of Being Fat
- 10. The gigantic portions served at most restaurants are no longer a problem
- 9. The phrase “throw my weight around” starts to mean something
- 8. Chicks dig double chins
- 7. Sumo wrestlers are considered near-royalty in Japan
- 6. Claim disability like when Homer Simpson got really fat
- 5. Rationalize buying a large gas-guzzling, polluting SUV because you no longer fit in a Prius
- 4. Win more seesaw and tug-of-war competitions
- 3. Survive famines
- 2. Save time and money by not dieting and exercising
- 1. Punch to the gut? No problem!
March 28th, 2007 at 11:12 am
Fatty.
And you’d be surprised how roomy a Prius really is.
March 28th, 2007 at 11:17 am
BEAU SCOTT, RISEN FROM THE DEAD, GRACES RBDN WITH HIS PRESENCE, DETAILS AT 11:00!
March 28th, 2007 at 2:45 pm
LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I beat your little bitty [moderator deleted] 3-2. Next time, i\’ll break two of your fingernails.
March 28th, 2007 at 3:03 pm
As the accuracy of this topic has now come into question, I think it would be best to have the next bout recorded and posted on YouTube, to which the follow up post here can link.
March 28th, 2007 at 3:09 pm
Wow, we have Beau and Matt at the same time! This is getting a bit freaky!
Also, Ryan, another plus of the bigger sized men is the fear the smaller size men feel when we walk towards them.
By “we” I mean “you”.
–Will
March 28th, 2007 at 3:12 pm
One important downer to being a large man is, or so I’ve heard, a man’s largeness inversely affects his “largeness”… Think about that before you add to your root-beer belly too much.
March 28th, 2007 at 3:30 pm
Beau, this is a family blog, let’s not go adding all this crudeness to it..
March 28th, 2007 at 4:26 pm
I disagree with #8. Then again, what do I know about every chick’s preference as to the double chin issue.
Btw, typo in #2– should be “by”, not “buy”. Clever, though.
March 28th, 2007 at 5:24 pm
Janet clearly discriminates against fat guys. Here is a list of some more fat guys she surely hates as well:
A. Luciano Pavarotti
B. Chris Farley
C. Alfred Hitchcock
D. Winston Churchill
E. James Earl Jones
F. John Candy
G. Drew Carey
March 28th, 2007 at 5:27 pm
Well, well. I guess the spelling typo criticism has set off RBDN!
March 28th, 2007 at 7:24 pm
Ryan, why don’t we ask Janet how she describes a “fat” guy — it may be that only you fit her current criteria…
March 28th, 2007 at 7:53 pm
All Hail YouTube.com!
I want to see it…
March 28th, 2007 at 8:16 pm
Had no idea my disagreement would touch off such indignation.
I’ve no personal criteria on what constitutes fat or not fat, no qualms either way, and finally, no opinion or observations on Ryan’s weight, having met him less than once.
I think I meant that as a whole, double chins aren’t a quality that “chicks dig” particularly. At least, I’d never heard of it mentioned in those lists of “qualities to look for” that all the girls I know have made during YW and Relief Society lessons… groan.
March 28th, 2007 at 8:31 pm
Janet\’s Relief Society List of Qualities to Look For in a Mate:
1- Not elephantine, not fleshy, not porcine, not rotund
2- Slim to fit build
3- Moderate eater
4- Neither blimpy nor tubby
6- Non-corpulent
7- Able to run a mile in under 7 minutes
8- Active lifestyle
9- High metabolism
10- BMI <25
March 28th, 2007 at 9:42 pm
How do you meet someone less than once? Is that sort of like a stalking situation, where she can see you but you can’t see her? Or is it a pass-in-the-hallway type of situation, where there’s a quick eye contact then a “hey, let’s stare at the opposite white wall and seem interested in the color” move.
Also, Janet, I do not believe you don’t have any criteria for fat vs. not fat. Everyone has criteria for fat, which is why we can look at someone like Ryan and think “wow, he’s fat”. I must, however, point out that ones view of ‘fat’, ‘almost fat’, ‘not fat’ and ‘very fat’ are influenced almost in whole by the society they live in; and in part by their parents, which leads me to my point. Those of us here in the Utah area may have skipped the ‘almost fat’ part, so here there is only ‘extremely, almost deadly skinny’ and ‘fat’, which leaves those of us like Ryan extremely single. The odd chance that Ryan might actually -have- a girlfriend is sheer luck.
Ryan, shouldn’t #10 be
March 28th, 2007 at 9:43 pm
… be something other than your script removing my tag..
… “Less than” 18.5, since we’re in Utah?
March 29th, 2007 at 12:11 am
I almost choked to death on a rice krispy treat, while laughing at these comments. This is why I’m a regular at RBDN, I guess.
Tsk, tsk. Ryan, it’s a worthy list, but certainly not mine. In fact, I don’t have a list, and the only “body requirement” I have, if you will, is that I’d prefer a tall guy over a short one.
I suppose that’s highly discriminatory, but geez, I’m 5′10″ and this is my continuous eternity of being hunched over and unable to wear shoes with soles we’re talking about.
“Met someone less than once”– it was during the mall project in December and I was so sleep deprived, I barely remember that month.
Ryan, I move that your fake new list should have 14 items, and that the three excess adjectives from #1 be moved to 11, 12, and 13 respectively; and that the additional clarifying adjective in #4 also be made its own number, namely, #14.
March 29th, 2007 at 9:25 am
Lots of comments very quickly! I’ll add one with no related content. I am content.
March 29th, 2007 at 10:25 am
Ryan, that means you and all of your short chubbiness are out for Janet. Such a sad ending to a moving story on RBDN. Add to that that she barely remembers you — must not have left much of an impression, I mean, she only frequents this blog about every day, no?
March 29th, 2007 at 10:30 am
ROTFLMAO
Well, not really
April 18th, 2007 at 3:09 pm
[…] Here’s a sample Creative Strategy for a health beverage, chosen because I was myopically described as “slow and sluggish” on the soccer field on Monday night. […]