Tue 10 Apr 2007
Laptops in the Boardroom: Blessing or Curse?
Posted by me under business , education , brief thoughts , technology
Talk of the Nations on NPR today interviewed Georgetown University law professor David Cole on his decision to ban laptops from his classroom. David wrote an op-ed piece for the Washington Post on Saturday describing the circumstances and effects of his no-laptop policy.
Says David,
Note-taking on a laptop encourages verbatim transcription. The note-taker tends to go into stenographic mode and no longer processes information in a way that is conducive to the give and take of classroom discussion. Because taking notes the old-fashioned way, by hand, is so much slower, one actually has to listen, think and prioritize the most important themes.
and,
In addition, laptops create temptation to surf the Web, check e-mail, shop for shoes or instant-message friends. That’s not only distracting to the student who is checking Red Sox statistics but for all those who see him, and many others, doing something besides being involved in class.
To back this up David states
95 percent admitted that they use their laptops in class for “purposes other than taking notes, such as surfing the Web, checking e-mail, instant messaging and the like.” Ninety-eight percent reported seeing fellow students do the same.
The results for David’s classroom experiment? according to an anonymous survey he conducted six weeks into the semester:
About 80 percent reported that they are more engaged in class discussion when they are laptop-free. Seventy percent said that, on balance, they liked the no-laptop policy.
At the University of Utah, where I have been an MBA student for the past two and 1/2 years, laptops are required for all students and are therefore seen in nearly every class. Recently however, a few teachers have asked us to shut them down after the end of classroom administrivia (assignments, announcements, scheduling etc) which is about 15 minutes into class.
Initially I was irked at this change. Though, shifting perspective, when teaching at UVSC I’ve had to teach students who had laptops open and I can attest how annoying that is from the professor’s point of view. It isn’t uncommon to have to repeat a question in order to get a response from the distracted students. Of course, for you non-academics, the immediate parallel to the classroom setting is in company meetings and that brings us to the question of the day, Should laptops be banned from company meetings?
I’ll summarize some more arguments for and against laptop bans in classes/meetings.
For the Ban
- Class time is for discussion and listening, not transcription of notes from professor to student. Professors should provide class notes.
- Laptops are the equivalent of taking a “bookshelf, mailbox, newspapers and a board game” to class, as such they are major distractions.
- “Doing five things at once on the laptop, students miss out on the unique educational experience of college, where the student’s sole responsibility is to learn as much as possible.”*
- Something about writing notes forces the brain to work and results in better comprehension.
Against the Ban
- Banning laptops just means the added annoyance of typing class notes after class.
- Students are able to contribute better to class discussion by bringing in material from the web
- Some students have illegible handwriting, so hand writing notes doesn’t work.
- Some jobs require students to be online and available over IM.
- Just disable the local wireless to prevent people from surfing.
- Some classes are highly technical in nature and not discussion-centric. Students need to be able to take down what the teacher says verbatim.
- We have technology, we should be using it?
- Why require laptops only to ban them?
- College students are adults and are mature enough to make their own decisions about such matters.
What do you think?!?
April 10th, 2007 at 4:17 pm
The argument between classes and meetings is completely different.
Businesses have a right to demand whatever they like in meetings, especially if they suspect employees are engaged in a game of FreeCell. For that matter, the computers usually belong to them anyway.
However, I think colleges requiring the same is just silly. A student can’t be forced to participate, or even concentrate. Attendance in college classes is usually not even checked or mandatory (except for discussions or labs). With students being in school on essentially their own dime, how they choose to waste their tuition money is their own business. Especially in upper division classes or heaven forbid, graduate classes, if a student can’t concentrate on the material without being nannied, they probably shouldn’t be there.
Even as an alumni of the U, this policy is new to me. I can sympathize with professors desperate for the attention requisite to them (and I can see this desperation increasing the lower down on the school totem pole you get). But I couldn’t afford a laptop then, and I don’t have one now. And laptops aren’t even conducive to some types of notetaking, such as those needing diagrams, pictures, charts, timelines, equations, so pretty much all of the college of science at the very least. So I guess I’m proscribing a libertarian policy towards laptops, or the policy such as it pre-mandatory laptops.
April 10th, 2007 at 6:05 pm
Bah. There are so many errors in that last paragraph. Most importantly, pretend I’m prescribing a libertarian policy, not PROscribing it, which would totally be the opposite of what I intended.
April 10th, 2007 at 11:00 pm
This just in from an email from that zany no-laptops law professor: “Thanks for keeping the discussion going! David Cole”
RBDN is getting pretty freaking popular.
April 10th, 2007 at 11:05 pm
hi treu! proscribe and prescribe. almost, but not quite, contranyms. learn more: contranyms
April 11th, 2007 at 8:45 am
I believe the classroom belongs to the instructor, not the students. If the instructor wants to ban laptops, (s)he should be able to.
As for the office. I believe a meeting should have a preset agenda of items to discuss, and anything additional should be noted, researched and discussed later. Computers should be available for presentations only.
–Me
April 11th, 2007 at 9:47 am
Thanks, Ryan! I wasn’t aware of that term and the list has some interesting words to make one think and/or giggle. However, some are debatable, and inflammable is just wrong (though maybe not by common usage). Apologies for threadjacking!
April 16th, 2007 at 12:13 pm
here’s another contranym link my buddy Tyler just emailed me: http://rinkworks.com/words/contronyms.shtml
May 4th, 2007 at 9:31 pm
“The New York Times reports that schools are abandoning their laptops-for-students programs. It turns out that the expense of providing laptops, expense of repairing laptops, difficulties of school network management, and discipline problems stemming from pornography, cheating, and cracking more than outweighed the educational benefits. Indeed, a number of schools have concluded that far from improving student achievement, laptops either had no effect or actively hindered academic performance.”
http://slashdot.org/articles/07/05/04/222217.shtml